Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with a score of 80.4 against 78.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. Xiaomi Black Shark is a way older, a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a slightly better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per display inch.
Vivo X60 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way higher resolution back camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.