Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a global score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro's general score of 78.8. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also older, somewhat thicker and heavier. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it provides some additional features.
Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a little more vivid screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixels density.
Vivo X60 Pro has much more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 4000mAh. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro. They have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality, a same size back-facing camera sensor, the same aperture and the same resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.