Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having an 81.4 score against 78.8. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is an older cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but it is a bit thinner and lighter anyway. These devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version, so it gives some nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a little bit better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, a 48 mega-pixels back facing camera, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster video frame rate.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3070mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.