Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, having a 78.8 score against 76.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but vivo X60 Pro has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some additional features and performance improvements. The vivo X60 Pro design is newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 9 GB more RAM.
Vivo X60 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, and although they both have the same sensor size, the same diafragm aperture and a same resolution back camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has a way higher video resolution. The vivo X60 Pro counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features superior battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.