Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is just a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 81.1 against 78.8. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. Despite being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also older, somewhat thicker and heavier.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixels density. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a bigger sensor providing a better image quality.
The vivo X60 Pro has a better storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.