Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a score of 79, which is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. Even being the best we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is an older, heavier and somewhat thicker phone than vivo X60 Pro. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The vivo X60 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2376px resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. The vivo X60 Pro has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same video quality, a 0.5 inches camera sensor, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a 48 mega-pixels camera, the vivo X60 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rates. The vivo X60 Pro counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has superior battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.