Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is a bit better than vivo X60's 75.1 overall score. The Google Pixel is a way older and thicker phone than the vivo X60, but Google managed to build it somewhat lighter anyway. The vivo X60 and the Google Pixel both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Google Pixel has a way smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels count per inch in the display.
Vivo X60 counts with a quite better hardware performance than Google Pixel, because it has 4 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores. Google Pixel's memory for applications and games is very similar to the vivo X60 one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 captures way better photos and videos than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low light environments, a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Vivo X60 has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.