Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is better than the vivo X60's 75.1 global score. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G and the vivo X60 were only released 4 months apart, the Google Pixel 4a 5G body is a little lighter but also a little thicker. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a screen that's very similar to the vivo X60 one, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. The vivo X60 has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 features a much better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to vivo X60's one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 features a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.