Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has a score of 89, which is much better than the vivo X60's 75.1 general score. Even though Google Pixel 5 and vivo X60 were released with only 6 months difference, the Google Pixel 5 construction is a little thicker but somewhat lighter than vivo X60. The vivo X60 has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 5. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 5 features a screen that's just as good as vivo X60's screen, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density. Vivo X60 captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the vivo X60 also counts with a way more mega pixels camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
The Google Pixel 5 features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as vivo X60, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X60 features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.