Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60's 75.1 global score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version. Despite of the fact the HTC One M9 is noticeably older and noticeably thicker than vivo X60, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
The HTC One M9 counts with a bit superior CPU than vivo X60, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64-bit CPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a better looking display than vivo X60, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Vivo X60 features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X60 features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 51% more battery size.
The vivo X60 takes much clearer pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also has a larger camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography, a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.