Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is slightly better than vivo X60's overall score of 75.1. Although HTC U Ultra is way older and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X60, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Vivo X60 features a faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than vivo X60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per display inch. The HTC U Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X60, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The vivo X60 features a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 43% more battery capacity. The vivo X60 counts with a much better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also has a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality, a much more mega pixels back camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.