Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than vivo X60, with a general score of 87.1 against 75.1. Although it's the best we are comparing, the LG Velvet design is older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the vivo X60. The vivo X60 has a little faster CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 counts with a little sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376, they both have the same amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Vivo X60 captures a little bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size sensor, a back-facing camera with a 48 mega-pixels and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 also has better 60 fps video frame rate.
The LG Velvet has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG Velvet and vivo X60 count with similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.