Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a little bit better than the vivo X60, getting a 77.4 score against 75.1. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo X60, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The vivo X60 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little sharper display than vivo X60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density. Vivo X60 takes much clearer photos and videos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 also has a much more MP back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and videos, better 60 fps video frame rates and a way larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X60 has a really longer battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.