Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60's score of 75.1. Even being the best in this comparison, the nubia Red Magic 3S is an older, heavier and noticeably thicker phone than the vivo X60. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but nubia Red Magic 3S has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while vivo X60 has Android 11, giving you a lot of extra features.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a processing unit that's very similar to the vivo X60 one, and although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X60 counts with a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery life than vivo X60, because it has a 16% more battery size. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X60, and although they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor and a back camera with a 48 mega pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.