Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than the vivo X60's 75.1 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is just a little bit lighter than vivo X60, but it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Vivo X60 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The vivo X60 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X60 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Vivo X60 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.