Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is better than the vivo X60's 75.1 score. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Samsung Galaxy A51's construction is just a bit lighter than the vivo X60, although it is just a bit thicker and was released only 15 months before.
Vivo X60 has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 also has more RAM. The vivo X60 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a little larger screen.
Vivo X60 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have a same size camera sensor, a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy A51 has a very superior memory to install games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A51, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.