Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism cube black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the vivo X60, having a overall score of 90.8 against 75.1. Both phones in this review include the same Android 11 OS, so both should offer the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is an older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier phone than vivo X60.
The vivo X60 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 also has a larger amount of RAM. Vivo X60 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a just a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior battery life than vivo X60, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.
The vivo X60 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the same video quality and the same resolution back facing camera, the vivo X60 also has a larger aperture and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.