Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is slightly better than the vivo X60, with a 75.8 score against 75.1. Even though Galaxy A6 is way older and just a little thicker than vivo X60, it's body is still just a bit lighter. The vivo X60 features a better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a better pixel density. Vivo X60 features a little bit better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 features a much better battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity. Vivo X60 features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, it also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back, a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.