Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is slightly better than vivo X60, having a score of 75.8 against 75.1. Even being the best phone in this review, Galaxy A7 (2017)'s construction is much older, a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier than vivo X60. Vivo X60 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 also has more RAM memory.
Vivo X60 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2376 resolution, a larger display and a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The vivo X60 features a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Vivo X60 counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity. The vivo X60 shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.