Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than the vivo X60's general score of 75.1. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has an older 10 version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best cellphone in this review, Samsung Galaxy A70 is an older, a little thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than the vivo X60.
Vivo X60 counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a bit better display pixel density.
The vivo X60 features a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also counts with faster video frame rates and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Galaxy A70 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than vivo X60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.