Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism bricks black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than the vivo X60, having a score of 92.9 against 75.1. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version. Although it's the best phone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier phone than vivo X60.
The vivo X60 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Vivo X60 counts with a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2376px resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than vivo X60, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features a slightly better camera than vivo X60, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a bit better battery life than vivo X60, because it has a 5 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.