Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is much better than vivo X60, getting an 85.2 score against 75.1. Even being the best phone we compare here, it must be noted that it's also notably older, a little heavier and a little bit thicker. The vivo X60 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 also has more RAM.
The vivo X60 counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) has a very superior memory to install applications and games than vivo X60, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X60 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera, faster video frame rate and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos.
Vivo X60 counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.