Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2021-04-02 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Alpha has a general score of 76.3, which is slightly better than vivo X60's global score of 75.1. The Galaxy Alpha body is lighter and thinner than vivo X60. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Galaxy Alpha has the newer 4.4.4 version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Alpha has a little bit better screen than vivo X60, although it has a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, a lot lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a way smaller display. The vivo X60 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM and a greater number of cores.
Vivo X60 captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also has higher video frame rates, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos and a much better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X60 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X60 has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 1860mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.