Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than the vivo X60, getting a global score of 88.1 against 75.1. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide you the same OS features. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Galaxy F62's design is somewhat heavier and way thicker than vivo X60.
Vivo X60 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid display than vivo X60, because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior memory for apps and games than vivo X60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X60, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs and a much better 64 MP resolution back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than vivo X60, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.