Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the vivo X60's global score of 75.1. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is a bit thinner than vivo X60, although it's extremely heavier and was released a bit more further than a year before. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X60 has Android 11.
Vivo X60 has just a little better performance than Galaxy Fold, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X60 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376px, it also counts with a quite higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo X60 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than vivo X60, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior battery life than vivo X60, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.