Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is a bit better than vivo X60's score of 75.1. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy M20's design is extremely older, somewhat thicker and a bit heavier than the vivo X60. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X60 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a little lower pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a better storage for games and applications than vivo X60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Vivo X60 counts with a better CPU than Galaxy M20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture, a way higher (4K) video quality and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with better battery lifetime than vivo X60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.