Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is better than vivo X60's 75.1 global score. Even though the Galaxy M51 is better than vivo X60, we must note that it is also extremely thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy M51 has the older 10 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X60 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little bit greater pixels density. The vivo X60 features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo X60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 has a slightly better camera than vivo X60, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy M51 features a way better battery performance than vivo X60, because it has a 63 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.