Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a general score of 98.9, which is a lot better than vivo X60's global score of 75.1. Although it's the best cellphone we are comparing, Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is a bit thicker and heavier than vivo X60. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version.
Vivo X60 and Galaxy Note 20 Ultra feature incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 4 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a slightly better display than vivo X60, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a quite larger screen and a higher count of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than vivo X60, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better memory to install games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X60, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.