Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the vivo X60, with an 81.2 score against 75.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has 5.0 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is older and thicker than vivo X60, it's body is still just a little bit lighter.
Vivo X60 has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Galaxy Note 3 counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X60, although it has a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit lower display density and a little bit smaller display.
The vivo X60 captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 also has a larger aperture, a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, higher video frame rates and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Vivo X60 has a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 counts with better battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 34% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.