Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than vivo X60's 75.1 score. These devices use Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Note 5 construction is just a little bit lighter than vivo X60, although it's a little thicker and was released 6 years before.
The Galaxy Note 5 has a much better looking screen than vivo X60, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better display density. The vivo X60 has much more memory for applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X60 has a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 7 more processing cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. Vivo X60 features a better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video.
Vivo X60 features a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.