Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than the vivo X60, having a global score of 80.4 against 75.1. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a noticeably older and just a bit thicker phone than the vivo X60, but Samsung was able to build it just a little lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more vivid display than vivo X60, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The vivo X60 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X60 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than vivo X60, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 256 GB. Vivo X60 has longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 34 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.