Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the vivo X60, having a score of 89 against 75.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 design is just a little lighter than vivo X60, although it's just a bit thicker and was released just a bit over a year before. Vivo X60 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy Note10. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X60 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a little higher 1080 x 2376px resolution. Vivo X60 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X60 also counts with a much bigger sensor and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than vivo X60, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The vivo X60 features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.