Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than vivo X60, having a overall score of 77.7 against 75.1. Samsung Galaxy Note3's construction is a little bit lighter than the vivo X60, although it's thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note3 has newer 4.4.2 version while vivo X60 has Android 11.
Vivo X60 has a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a larger screen, a little better display density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2376 resolution. Vivo X60 counts with a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The vivo X60 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The vivo X60 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.