Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is a little bit better than vivo X60, with a general score of 79.5 against 75.1. Galaxy Note7's body is a little lighter than vivo X60, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released 5 years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a little more vivid screen than vivo X60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Vivo X60 has a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note7 has slightly more memory for games and applications than vivo X60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The vivo X60 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X60 shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.