Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than the vivo X60's 75.1 score. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is an older, just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier cellphone than vivo X60. Vivo X60 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Vivo X60 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X60, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little bit better camera than vivo X60, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size, the same video definition and a camera with a 48 mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better battery duration than vivo X60, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.