Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the vivo X60's overall score of 75.1. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and vivo X60 has Android 11, so it provides some extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy S20 is older and just a little bit thicker than the vivo X60, it's body is still just a little lighter.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better screen than vivo X60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better pixels amount in each inch in the display. The vivo X60 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S20, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Vivo X60 features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The vivo X60 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 also counts with faster video frame rates and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.