Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than vivo X60, getting a overall score of 98 against 75.1. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has newer 13 version while vivo X60 has Android 11, offering some extra features and increased performance. Although it's the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also older, somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier.
Vivo X60 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper screen than vivo X60, because it has a little bigger display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a higher screen density.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior storage for games and applications than vivo X60, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than vivo X60, and although they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a lot higher video quality and a back facing camera with a way better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features greater battery lifetime than vivo X60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.