Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the vivo X60, with a 93.4 score against 75.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a more recent 13 version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version, offering some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 body is newer and a little bit lighter, but also just a little bit thicker than vivo X60.
The Galaxy S22 has a much better looking display than vivo X60, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy S22 has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the vivo X60 one, they have the same 128 GB internal storage.
Vivo X60 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S22. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The vivo X60 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity. Galaxy S22 counts with just a bit better camera than vivo X60, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also has a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a lot bigger sensor and a more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.