Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the vivo X60's 75.1 global score. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer than the vivo X60's, although it's incredibly heavier and thicker. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while vivo X60 has Android 11 version, offering a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The vivo X60 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than vivo X60, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a quite bigger screen and a greater pixels number in each display inch.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than vivo X60, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher video quality, a much more MP back facing camera and a much bigger sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much memory to store more apps and games as the vivo X60 one, both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery duration than vivo X60, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.