Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | -- |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | -- |
| 6.21 ounces | -- |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than vivo X60, having a score of 90.7 against 75.1. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than vivo X60. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version, so it counts with some extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a way better display than vivo X60, because it has a little bit bigger display, a better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with much more memory for apps and games than vivo X60, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X60 counts with a way better hardware performance than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S25 Ultra features superior battery performance than vivo X60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than vivo X60, because it has a back camera with a much higher 200 megapixels resolution, a way larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality, a much higher video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.