Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-02 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Gold and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60's 75.1 general score. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's body is notably older, thicker and heavier than the vivo X60. The vivo X60 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a bit sharper display than vivo X60, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better display density. Galaxy S8 Active features just a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Vivo X60 features a much better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the vivo X60 also counts with a camera with much more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and higher video frame rate.
Vivo X60 has a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has an 8% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.