Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the vivo X60, getting a global score of 81 against 75.1. Even being the best in this review, we must tell that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and extremely thicker device. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 operating system. Vivo X60 features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 also has more RAM.
Vivo X60 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels and a bit larger display. Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The vivo X60 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution, a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a lot better video definition.
Vivo X60 features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.