Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than vivo X60, with an 88.5 score against 75.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older and just a bit heavier phone than vivo X60, but Samsung was able to make it just a bit thinner anyway. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and vivo X60 has Android 11.
The vivo X60 counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. Both have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper display than vivo X60, because it has a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels.
The vivo X60 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the vivo X60 also has a camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage for applications and games than vivo X60, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 30% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.