Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the vivo X60, with a general score of 92.3 against 75.1. Both phones in this review have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the same operating system features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G and vivo X60 were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G body is just a little bit heavier but also just a little bit thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit sharper display than vivo X60, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a little bit larger display. Vivo X60 and Galaxy Z Flip 5G count with similar processing units, both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a superior storage to store more apps and games than vivo X60, because it has more internal memory. Vivo X60 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video resolution, the vivo X60 also has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X60 has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.