Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the vivo X60, getting a 94.6 score against 75.1. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the vivo X60 were released with only 7 months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is a bit thinner but much heavier. Both devices we compare here use the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should offer very similar OS features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2's processing unit is very similar to vivo X60's CPU, and although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 4 GB more RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X60 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count per inch in the display.
The vivo X60 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X60 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than vivo X60, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit better battery performance than vivo X60, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.