Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.77 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than vivo X60, with a general score of 90.6 against 75.1. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 and the vivo X60 were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is a lot heavier but thinner. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
The vivo X60 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X60 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel count in each display inch.
The vivo X60 shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X60, because it has 128 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better battery life than vivo X60, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.