Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the vivo X60, with a 77.8 score against 75.1. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while vivo X60 has Android 11, providing some additional features and performance tweaks. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is extremely newer and noticeably thinner, but also heavier than the vivo X60.
Vivo X60 has a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much sharper display than vivo X60, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels in each inch of display, a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a bigger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X60, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than vivo X60, because it has a 33 percent greater battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than vivo X60, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger back camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video and a better resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.