Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than the vivo X60, having a general score of 82.4 against 75.1. Even being the best we compare here, it must be told that it is also a just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 operating system.
Vivo X60 has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X60, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than vivo X60, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos or video in low light environments and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features superior battery performance than vivo X60, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.