Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-04-02 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.28 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a bit better than vivo X60, getting a overall score of 81.1 against 75.1. Although it's the best we compare here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro body is older, heavier and thicker than the vivo X60. These devices have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has older 10 version and vivo X60 has Android 11 version.
The vivo X60 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X60, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The vivo X60 features just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X60 also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has just a bit better camera than vivo X60, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a much more megapixels back facing camera and a larger sensor taking better quality photographs.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has improved battery lifetime than vivo X60, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.