Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is better than vivo X70, getting an 82 score against 73.8. Despite being the best in this comparison, iPhone XR is a older, just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone than the vivo X70. IPhone XR counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than vivo X70, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Apple iPhone XR features a little more vivid display than vivo X70, although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per display inch, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a quite smaller screen. The vivo X70 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 captures much clearer videos and photos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a tinier sensor and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 also counts with a much better 40 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo X70 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.